What instructions did the jury receive in Arbery’s death?

By KATE BRUMBACK Associated Press

ATLANTA (AP) – Before jurors in the trial of the three men accused of the murder of Ahmaud Arbery retired to the jury room to begin their deliberations, the judge read them specific instructions on the law applicable to this case.

Greg McMichael. left, listens to the jury selection for the trial of him and his son, Travis McMichael, and neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, at the Glynn County Courthouse on Monday, October 25, 2021, in Brunswick , Georgia. The three are accused of the murder in February 2021 of Ahmaud Arbery, 25. (AP Photo / Stephen B. Morton, Pool)

The instructions to the jury, also known as the instructions to the jury, have been carefully crafted with input from defense and prosecution lawyers, with each party trying to ensure that instructions on the parts of the law that support their case were included. The disproportionately white jury began deliberating on Tuesday after hearing 10 days of testimony.

>>> READ MORE: Highlights from the daily trial of the murder of Ahmaud Arbery

After seeing Arbery running around their neighborhood near the port city of Brunswick in Georgia in February 2020, father and son Greg and Travis McMichael armed themselves, jumped into a van and chased the 25-year-old black man. A neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, joined the chase and recorded a video on his cell phone, capturing the moments when Travis McMichael shot Arbery with a shotgun. The three accused are white.


Georgia court rules provide instructions that deal with most situations and serve as a template from which lawyers and the judge work to create a set of jury instructions tailored to a particular case.

Lawyers on each side should have their proposed jury instructions ready on the first day of trial, and then meet with the judge after testimony at trial to determine the exact wording of the instructions in the case.

“This is the most important part of the trial,” said Andrew Fleischman, an Atlanta appeals lawyer who is not involved in the case. “Lawyers don’t pay enough attention to it, and not the public, but that’s where we define what the law is and what the real elements of crime will be.”


The instructions include the law that applies to the facts of the case as well as definitions of relevant legal terms and concepts.

Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski presents final argument to the jury during the trial of Travis McMichael, his father, Gregory McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan, at the Glynn County Courthouse on Monday, November 22, 2021, in Brunswick, Georgia. . three men accused of the murder in February 2020 of Ahmaud Arbery, 25. (AP Photo / Stephen B. Morton, Pool)

During the trial, lawyers on each side try to admit evidence that supports their theory of the case and the law they deem applicable. There must be at least some evidence admitted during the trial that supports the applicability of a given law for it to be included in the jury instructions.

At a prosecution conference Friday, attorneys worked with Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley to offer final instructions ahead of oral argument.

“By the time lawyers give their conclusions, they know what the instructions will be,” Fleischman said. “It’s a very important part of a good closing, telling the jury what the instructions mean in relation to this case.”


After the case’s pleadings are delivered, the judge instructs the jury to read the instructions aloud.

The instructions in this case were long; it took Walmsley 42 minutes to read them to the jurors. It is up to the judge to decide whether to give the jurors a hard copy of the instructions to consult while they deliberate. Walmsley gave a copy to the jurors.


Walmsley defined each of the counts: murder with malice, indictable murder, aggravated assault, forcible confinement and criminal attempt to commit forcible confinement.

He also explained that for Bryan, the jury may consider less serious offenses – common assault, reckless driving and reckless driving – instead of a charge of aggravated assault.

The judge explained the law governing criminal trespassing and burglary, which is relevant because lawyers for the McMichaels argued that their clients believed Arbery had been inside a house under construction and was responsible for burglaries. The McMichaels were attempting to make a citizen arrest and Travis McMichael shot Arbery when he hit back, their lawyers said.

William “Roddie” Bryan, right, sits with his attorney before argument begins before the jury during the trial of him, Travis McMichael, and his father Greg McMichael, at the Glynn County Courthouse on Monday 22 November 2021, in Brunswick, Georgia. The three men accused of the murder in February 2020 of Ahmaud Arbery, 25. (AP Photo / Stephen B. Morton, Pool)

By defining the citizen arrest for the jury, the judge specified the conditions that must be present to justify this arrest. He also noted that a person arresting a legitimate citizen cannot use “excessive force or an illegal degree of force”. And he told the jury that a person who is the target of wrongful citizen arrest “has the right to resist arrest with reasonably necessary force.”

Self-defense cannot be used as a defense if the person is the aggressor in a confrontation and excessive force cannot be used in self-defense, the judge said.

He also told the jury that with the defenses of citizen arrest and self-defense, the prosecution must rebut those defenses beyond a reasonable doubt.


Jurors can send a note when they have questions during deliberations. When this happens, the judge and lawyers work together to craft an appropriate response.


The jury’s instructions are intended to inform the jury about the applicable law. If there is an error in the instructions to the jury, it may result in a conviction being overturned.

“Charges before the jury are where the best appeals occur, because an issue of charge to the jury, whether the judge is wrong, is most likely to lead to reversible error,” Fleischman said.

Defense lawyers have repeatedly objected to parts of the jury’s instructions, which allows them to keep this question for appeal.


Associated Press writer Russ Bynum in Brunswick, Georgia, contributed to this report.

For the latest news and trial updates on MN v. McMichael, et al.,

visit CourtTV.com/Arbery

About Jessica J. Bass

Check Also

Child molester appears in county court after jury found him guilty of assaulting his sister-in-law | Bendigo Advertiser

news, news-locales, bendigo, court, abuse, child abuse, sexual assault A WOMAN who was sexually assaulted …